Both Shah and Ngai clearly outline the relationship between Asian sexuality and Asian spaces, however, what both works fail to fully articulate is how white sexuality/white spaces are constructed in hierarchical opposition to other raced spaces. Because the West is the primary setting for both histories, I can’t help but think of how the rhetoric of Manifest Destiny sexualized the “virgin” territories of the West. I’m thinking of images like John Gast’s painting American Progress (circa 1874), which I’ve posted on the right. By examining how “American” space/boundaries were conceived of as both white and fertile in discourse, prior to the policies of both public health and the Johnson-Reed Act, I think that we can come to a fuller understanding of what was thought to be at stake, and how easily race, place, and sexuality were united in the racist rhetoric of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.
I would be grateful if anyone else considered and posted on how the construction of whiteness and its relationship to other perceived racial and national identities operates, particularly as it relates to domesticity.
No comments:
Post a Comment